Skip to content

One-Rep Max Calculator

Estimate your one-rep max from any weight and rep count using the Epley and Brzycki formulas.

Runs in your browserFree, no sign-up

Settings

Results update automatically as you type.

Estimated one-rep max

Epley formula
116.7 kg
Brzycki formula
112.5 kg
Average
114.6 kg

Training percentages

% of 1RMWeightTypical reps
95%108.9 kg~2
90%103.1 kg~4
85%97.4 kg~6
80%91.7 kg~8
75%85.9 kg~10
70%80.2 kg~12
65%74.5 kg~14

About the One-Rep Max Calculator

This one-rep max calculator estimates the heaviest weight you could lift for a single repetition, based on a weight and rep count from a recent set, using the two most widely cited prediction formulas — Epley and Brzycki — alongside a percentage table for programming training weights. It saves attempting a genuinely maximal single lift, which carries real injury risk without a spotter and proper technique, by estimating it from a safer, sub-maximal set instead.

How to use the One-Rep Max Calculator

  1. 1

    Enter the weight you lifted for a working set.

  2. 2

    Enter how many reps you completed with that weight, taken close to failure for an accurate estimate.

  3. 3

    Read the estimated one-rep max from both formulas and their average.

  4. 4

    Check the training percentage table to convert that max into practical weights for different rep ranges.

What people use it for

Programming a strength training block

Convert an estimated one-rep max into specific working weights for a percentage-based programme, such as 5x5 at 80% or a deload week at 60%.

Tracking strength progress over time

Recalculate an estimated max periodically from a comparable working set to see genuine strength gains without needing to test a real maximal lift every time.

Setting a safe starting weight for a new lift

Estimate a rough one-rep max for a new exercise from a light, comfortable set before working up, rather than guessing at an unfamiliar movement.

The Epley and Brzycki formulas

Epley's formula estimates one-rep max as the lifted weight multiplied by one plus reps divided by 30. Brzycki's formula instead multiplies the lifted weight by 36 divided by 37 minus reps. Both are regression equations fitted to real lifting data from different studies, and while they broadly agree at low rep counts, they diverge more as reps increase — Brzycki tends to predict a slightly lower max at higher rep counts than Epley does, which is why averaging the two, as this tool does, gives a reasonable middle estimate rather than favouring either formula's particular bias.

Why the formulas break down above about 12 reps

Both formulas assume the set was taken close to muscular failure and that strength, not endurance, is the limiting factor — an assumption that holds reasonably well for sets of roughly 2 to 10 reps. Beyond about 12 reps, muscular endurance and metabolic fatigue start to matter as much as raw strength, and the formulas' predictions become progressively less reliable, often overestimating what could genuinely be lifted for a single rep.

Tips

  • Use a set taken close to genuine failure for the most accurate estimate — a set stopped well short of failure understates your real capacity.
  • Estimates from a 3 to 6 rep set tend to be the most reliable; very low or very high rep counts push the formulas towards their limits.
  • Retest periodically rather than relying on one estimate indefinitely — strength changes, and an old estimate can be meaningfully out of date after a few months of training.

Frequently asked questions

Why do the two formulas give slightly different answers?
Epley and Brzycki are both regression formulas fitted to real lifting data, but from different datasets and with different assumptions about how strength falls off with rep count, so they diverge slightly, particularly at higher rep counts. Averaging them, as shown here, is a common way to split the difference.
How accurate is an estimated 1RM compared to actually testing it?
Reasonably close for rep ranges of about 2 to 10, but these formulas assume the set was taken close to failure and become progressively less reliable above roughly 12 reps, where muscular endurance starts to matter as much as raw strength. A true maximal single-rep test, done safely with proper form and a spotter, is always more accurate than any formula.
What are the training percentages useful for?
Many strength programmes prescribe work sets as a percentage of your one-rep max rather than an absolute weight, so this table converts an estimated max directly into practical training weights for common rep ranges.

Looking for something else? Browse all calculators or see every tool.